Assays

Simulation data from FMv2 calibrated for experiment L&H2, an experiment run at 18.5C instead of the 20.5C of the replicate and related studies. The Excel file includes the mean and SD of the relevant experimental data, and the figure panels.

Metabolite analysis in clock mutants: Col-0 parent and mutants gi-201, toc1-101 and prr7prr9; WS parent and lhy/cca1 double mutant. Plants grown in Golm and harvested at End of Day and End of Night, , assays 22 major metabolites. More detail on TiMet wiki if required. Heteroscedastic t-tests to highlight most significant changes, without multiple-testing correction.

Metabolite analysis in clock mutants: Col-0 parent and mutants gi-201, toc1-101 and prr7prr9; WS parent and lhy/cca1 double mutant. Plants grown in Golm and harvested at End of Day and End of Night, , assays 22 major metabolites. More detail on TiMet wiki if required. Heteroscedastic t-tests to highlight most significant changes, without multiple-testing correction.

Metabolite analysis in clock mutants: Col-0 parent and mutants gi-201, toc1-101 and prr7prr9; WS parent and lhy/cca1 double mutant. Plants grown in Golm and harvested at End of Day and End of Night, , assays 22 major metabolites. More detail on TiMet wiki if required. Heteroscedastic t-tests to highlight most significant changes, without multiple-testing correction.

RNA timeseries data from TiMet for clock genes in prr7 prr9 and Col wild-type plants under 12L:12D cycle and LL

RNA timeseries data from TiMet for clock genes in prr7 prr9 and Col wild-type plants under 12L:12D cycle and LL

RNA timeseries data from TiMet for clock genes in prr7 prr9 and Col wild-type plants under 12L:12D cycle and LL

Combination of multiple sub-models to form Framework Model version 2

Biomass, leaf number and metabolites in Col0 (WT), prr7, prr7prr9, and lsf1. Metabolite data from plants after 28 days of growth were analysed most (27 days 'end of night', 28 days 'end of day' and 'end of night'). The data file also includes data from 21 days of growth ('end of day' and 'end of night'), which is useful for comparison to early-flowering plants not tested here, such as the lhycca1 double mutant, that flower before 28 days, altering their physiology.

Biomass, leaf number and metabolites in Col0 (WT), prr7, prr7prr9, and lsf1. Metabolite data from plants after 28 days of growth were analysed most (27 days 'end of night', 28 days 'end of day' and 'end of night'). The data file also includes data from 21 days of growth ('end of day' and 'end of night'), which is useful for comparison to early-flowering plants not tested here, such as the lhycca1 double mutant, that flower before 28 days, altering their physiology.

Biomass, leaf number and metabolites in Col0 (WT), prr7, prr7prr9, and lsf1. Metabolite data from plants after 28 days of growth were analysed most (27 days 'end of night', 28 days 'end of day' and 'end of night'). The data file also includes data from 21 days of growth ('end of day' and 'end of night'), which is useful for comparison to early-flowering plants not tested here, such as the lhycca1 double mutant, that flower before 28 days, altering their physiology.

Biomass, leaf number and metabolites in Col0 (WT), prr7, prr7prr9, and lsf1. Metabolite data from plants after 28 days of growth were analysed most (27 days 'end of night', 28 days 'end of day' and 'end of night'). The data file also includes data from 21 days of growth ('end of day' and 'end of night'), which is useful for comparison to early-flowering plants not tested here, such as the lhycca1 double mutant, that flower before 28 days, altering their physiology.

Collection of clock models that rescale transcript variables to account for absolute units. The relationship between models is summarised in the attached 'model evolution' document and in more detail in the linked publications (preprint version linked in the Snapshot; publication Urquiza and Millar, In Silico Plants 2021 did not have a DOI when Snapshot was created).

Each model is presented three times,

• • without a light:dark cycle,
• • with an ISSF (Adams et al. JBR 2012) that is set up for ...

Model files for FMv1.5. The model is based on FMv1 of Chew et al. PNAS 2014, which is also in FAIRDOMHub and linked to the Model record as an 'Attribution'. FMv1 was extended in this work by Hannah Kinmonth-Schultz and Daniel Seaton, in Matlab.

Plant material The same plant material used for transcriptome analysis in (Flis et al., 2016) was the basis of our proteome study. Briefly, Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 plants were grown on GS 90 soil mixed in a ratio 2:1 (v/v) with vermiculite. Plants were grown for 1 week in a 16 h light (250 μmol m−2 s−1, 20 °C)/8 h dark (6 °C) regime followed by an 8 h light (160 μmol m−2 s−1, 20 °C)/16 h dark (16 °C) regime for one week. Plants were then replanted with five seedlings per pot, transferred for ...

The models in this record were published in Flis et al. Royal Society Open Biology 2015. They will be submitted to Biomodels when we have a PubMed ID for the paper.

Original model: Arabidopsis clock model P2011.1.1 from Pokhilko et al. Mol Syst. Biol. 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2012.6

Published version is Biomodels ID 00412, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/compneur-srv/biomodels-main/BIOMD0000000412 Also public in Plasmo as PLM_64, with several versions, http://www.plasmo.ed.ac.uk/plasmo/models/model.shtml?accession=PLM_64 ...

The models in this record were published in Flis et al. Royal Society Open Biology 2015. They will be submitted to Biomodels when we have a PubMed ID for the paper.

Original model: Arabidopsis clock model P2011.1.1 from Pokhilko et al. Mol Syst. Biol. 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2012.6

Published version is Biomodels ID 00412, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/compneur-srv/biomodels-main/BIOMD0000000412 Also public in Plasmo as PLM_64, with several versions, http://www.plasmo.ed.ac.uk/plasmo/models/model.shtml?accession=PLM_64 ...

This model is termed P2011 and derives from the article: The clock gene circuit in Arabidopsis includes a repressilator with additional feedback loops. Alexandra Pokhilko, Aurora Piñas Fernández, Kieron D Edwards, Megan M Southern, Karen J Halliday & Andrew J Millar Mol. Syst. Biol. 2012; 8: 574, submitted 9 Aug 2011 and published 6 March 2012. Link Link to Supplementary Information, including equations. Minor errors in the published Supplementary Information are described in a file attached ...

Data for Figure 2I-2K in Chew et al. PNAS 2014. Experimental conditions: ∼21.3 °C; 12:12-h light/dark cycle; light intensity, 110 μmol·m−2·s−1;mean daytime CO2 level, 375 ppm. The error bars show the SEs of five plants Further detail on the experimental conditions is contained in the public record on the BioDare resource, link to follow

Data for Figure 3G and Supplementary Figure 4, including gas exchange measurements and photo of the experimental setup. The 'Summary' sheets in the XLSX files often include published graphs. Simulation data are included from FMv1.

These data were acquired in a separate experiment from the biomass, in March 2013. Replication of the earlier biomass study was imperfect, as some plants became a little dry when watering was controlled to reduce moss growth. Sufficient plants grew strongly to measure ...

Data for Figure 3G and Supplementary Figure 4, including gas exchange measurements and photo of the experimental setup. The 'Summary' sheets in the XLSX files often include published graphs. Simulation data are included from FMv1.

These data were acquired in a separate experiment from the biomass, in March 2013. Replication of the earlier biomass study was imperfect, as some plants became a little dry when watering was controlled to reduce moss growth. Sufficient plants grew strongly to measure ...

Data for Figure 3A-3F and Supplementary Figures 2, 3, and 6, including leaf number, biomass and leaf areas. Image data for leaf areas are included in a .ZIP archive. The 'Summary' sheets in the XLSX files often include published graphs. Simulation data are included from FMv1. These data were acquired in June 2012. Experimental conditions: ~22C constant temperature; 12:12-h light/dark cycle; light intensity = 130 μmol·m−2·s−1; average daytime CO2 concentration = 375 ppm. 10 plants per genotype per ...

Data for Figure 3A-3F and Supplementary Figures 2, 3, and 6, including leaf number, biomass and leaf areas. Image data for leaf areas are included in a .ZIP archive. The 'Summary' sheets in the XLSX files often include published graphs. Simulation data are included from FMv1. These data were acquired in June 2012. Experimental conditions: ~22C constant temperature; 12:12-h light/dark cycle; light intensity = 130 μmol·m−2·s−1; average daytime CO2 concentration = 375 ppm. 10 plants per genotype per ...

Data for Figures 5D-5F and Supplementary Figure 7B, 7C, including biomass and leaf areas. Image data for leaf areas are included in a .ZIP archive, with two samples as published in 5D. The 'Summary' sheets in the XLSX files include published graphs. Simulation data are included from FMv1. These data were acquired in April 2014, in a separate experiment from the La(er) and Fei-0. Experimental conditions: ∼20.7 °C constant temperature; 12h:12h light/dark cycle; light intensity = 100μmol·m−2·s−1; ...

Data for Figures 5D-5F and Supplementary Figure 7B, 7C, including biomass and leaf areas. Image data for leaf areas are included in a .ZIP archive, with two samples as published in 5D. The 'Summary' sheets in the XLSX files include published graphs. Simulation data are included from FMv1. These data were acquired in April 2014, in a separate experiment from the La(er) and Fei-0. Experimental conditions: ∼20.7 °C constant temperature; 12h:12h light/dark cycle; light intensity = 100μmol·m−2·s−1; ...

Data for Figure 4, from the prior publication of Sulpice et al. Mol. Plant 2014: Biomass, net growth and starch levels at end of day and end of night, under light:dark cycles of 4:20, 6:18, 8:16, 12:12 and 18:6 hours.

These Python scripts define and simulate the translational coincidence model. This model takes measured transcript dynamics (Blasing et al, 2005) in 12L:12D, measured synthesis rates of protein in light compared to dark (Pal et al, 2013), and outputs predicted changes in protein abundance between short (6h) and long (18h) photoperiods. These are compared to the photoperiod proteomics dataset we generated.

Transcript profiling by microarray in 4, 6, 8, 12 and 18 h photoperiods, originally published in Flis et al, 2016, Photoperiod-dependent changes in the phase of core clock transcripts and global transcriptional outputs at dawn and dusk in Arabidopsis. doi: 10.1111/pce.12754.

The multi-compartmental metabolic network of Arabidopsis thaliana was reconstructed and optimized in order to explain growth stoichiometry of the plant both in light and in dark conditions. Balances and turnover of energy (ATP/ADP) and redox (NAD(P)H/NAD(P)) metabolites as well as proton in different compartments were estimated. The model showed that in light conditions, the plastid ATP balance depended on the relationship between fluxes through photorespiration and photosynthesis including both ...