Bayesian hypothesis testing reveals that reproducible models in systems biology get more citations

This study investigates the citations of reproducible vs. not reproducible papers and is based on 328 published models, classified by Tiwari et al. based on their reproducibility are analyzed in this study. Hypothese testing is performed using a flexible Bayesian approach for a complete assessment of posteriors. The approach handels outliers via a non-central t distribution. Results show that reproducible papers are significantly more citet between 2013 and 2020, i.e. 10 years after the introduction of SBML. In conclusion, this statistical analysis demonstrates long-term benefits of reproducible modeling for the individual researcher and the scientific community.

SEEK ID: https://fairdomhub.org/studies/1103

hidden item

Projects: Working Group Nicole Radde

Study position:

Projects: Working Group Nicole Radde

help Creators and Submitter
Citation
Höpfl, S. (2022). Bayesian hypothesis testing reveals that reproducible models in systems biology get more citations. FAIRDOMHub. https://doi.org/10.15490/FAIRDOMHUB.1.STUDY.1103.1
Note: This is a citation for Snapshot 1 of this Study, the contents of which may vary from what is shown on this page.
Snapshots
Snapshot 1 (3rd Oct 2022) DOI
Activity

Views: 79

Created: 29th Sep 2022 at 14:57

Last updated: 3rd Oct 2022 at 18:29

Powered by
(v.1.12.3)
Copyright © 2008 - 2022 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies